National Union of Students passes discriminatory motions
Dears, I don’t know what has become of the dear old National Union of Students (NUS). When I was a member, more years ago than I like to think about, it was a welcoming, all-inclusive body where you could be yourself, nobody judged you and they fought bigotry and injustice wheresoever they perceived it. Today it seems it has become the haven of hyperfeminist bigots who don’t have a bloody clue about gay mannerisms or crossdressing, yet who are happy to make racist gestures.
On 25 March 2015 delegates at the NUS Women’s Conference passed a number of motions aimed at the LGBTQI community within UK colleges and universities. And, as feminazis are wont to do, they got it all wrong. So very, very wrong.
Motion 503, forwarded by the NUS LGBT Committee called “Dear White Gay Men: Stop Approprirating Black Women”
A bloody sad state of affairs when British students cannot spell “appropriating”, I’m sure you’ll agree, dears. That apart however, the motion claimed that white gay men are using affectations common with black women, explained thus;
“This may be manifested in the emulation of the mannerisms, language (particularly AAVE- African American Vernacular English) and phrases that can be attributed to black women. White gay men may often assert that they are “strong black women” or have an “inner black woman”, White gay men are the dominant demographic within the LGBT community, and they benefit from both white privilege and male privilege.
I have never, for the life of me, ever heard any gay man claim to have a strong or inner black woman inside him. If there are such, I’d just laugh in their faces. That apart, there are no other examples of mannerisms, language and phrases, so this motion is very much open to the interpretation of the NUS Feminazi Thought Police. There are many men in the LGBTQI community who are camp and effeminate. I happen to be one myself, as my regular followers are aware of. Am I now to be decried by some harpie on a university campus should I dare to sashay, as I am wont to do, or use camp language and phrases which they may associate with black women? Let them just try. My reply would be to shove a hand in the complainants face at full arms length and tell them, “Talk to the hand, sister, cos the face ain’t listenin’.”
Motion 503 is a terrible move for the NUS and is actually discriminatory on two counts; firstly it generalises about white gay men, and assumes that a great many use such mannerisms. That is homophobic. And were that not enough, the reverse side of that particular coin is that it generalies that certain language, mannerisms and phrases are common to black women. And that, my dears, is both racist and sexist in one fell swoop, as it assumes that the delegates know the minds of black women.
But onto the motion which most here will be interested in, and I do hope my fellow trans, CD and genderqueer friends are sitting down – you may need a stiff drink by your hand as well. Brace yourselves dears.
“To issue a statement condemning the use of crossdressing as a mode of fancy dress, To encourage unions to ban clubs and societies from holding events which permit or encourage (cisgender) members to use cross-dressing as a mode of fancy dress,”
The reason for this motion? That trans women (no mention of trans men) may find crossdressing by cishet men offensive. Hands up here all you lovely trans ladies who are at all offended by cishet men crossdressing. No? No, thought not. The fact is, as many who come here know full and well, that crossdressers and trans people have a mutual respect for each other and we stand up for each other. Therefore, this motion immediately generalises in that it assumes to know what trans women are thinking, and that dears is transphobic. Secondly, it attempts to drive a wedge between us CD and trans sisters. That ain’t happenin’ girls. Never on my watch.
The NUS has allowed dispensation in this for genderqueer students who want to use cross-dressing in their everyday lives as a mode of expression, or who wish to crossdress by dressing as a fictional character in fancy dress. Aww, how sweet of them.
BIG problem here, dears. If they seek to ban clubs and societies with encourage cisgender crossdressing, then they are up against the overwhelming vast majority of crossdressers. This effectively means that if the Beaumont Society, who give help, guidance and support to crossdressers and their families, tried to give a speech or host a help event at a college or university, the NUS would attempt to ban it, on the grounds that the majority of their members are crossdressers.
So the NUS would in effect ban any such group from giving on-campus help and advice to cisgender crossdressing students. And of course, because this motion would effectively do that, that could only add to the stress and emotional turmoil such students are already going through. Moreover, it is not outwith the bounds of possibility that a young student just ‘finding’ themselves, may actually be trans, and the NUS stamping down on them like this could actually force them back into the closet.
And just who do the NUS Women’s Committee think they are to state that a genderqueer person may crossdress but a cishet person may not? That is pure discrimination which not only does not understand crossdressing, it does not even attempt to understand it.
The entire motion is based upon the bigoted perceptions of women who are not crossdressers, and this shows in part of the wording of this motion; “which permit or encourage (cisgender) members to use cross-dressing as a mode of fancy dress,” That statement, allied with the ‘dispensation’ that genderqueer students can crossdress as fictional characters says it all. They think we’re all drag queens, dears. Yet again, they prove their complete and total ignorance of a subject they have not even attempted to research, or indeed, actually try asking crossdressers.
These motions were passed at the conference, dears, and have been widely criticised ever since.
Oh yes, that bit about racist gestures. To emphasise that some people find some gestures damaging, instead of clapping, those present showed ‘jazz hands’, after one NUS Women’s delegate Tweeted, “Some delegates are requesting that we move to jazz hands rather than clapping as it’s triggering anxiety. Please be mindful!” For those of you not in the know, ‘jazz hands’ are where you hold your hands either side of your face with the fingers full open, and grin widely – a mannerism common to minstrel shows, where white men would ‘black up’ as black men, and sing songs synonymous with African-Americans in the US deep south. An act so racist that it is banned almost everywhere today. Oh well done. That’s very progressive, isn’t it?
So, well done NUS Women’s Conference for showing your uninformed and ignorant prejudice by giving your blessing to homophobia, sexism, transphobia, mysandry, and racism. But at least now I know why you call your decisions ‘motions’ – because like you, they’re full of shit.
You must be logged in to post a comment.